Last reviewed
Correct answer: B. One or the other — reporting into this conversation ties the worker to this session
Explanation
The principle — where a worker reports and how long it lasts are the same fact seen twice, so asking for both of these is asking for two different surfaces at once.
Why the key is correct — the reporting lines are stated together: subagents report results back to the conversation that spawned them, and agent view sessions report only to you. And the lifetime follows from the first: subagents work within a single session. A worker that reports into this conversation is a delegated worker inside one session that does a side task in its own context and returns a summary — which is precisely what cannot outlive the session it belongs to. The wish is not unreasonable, it is just two surfaces.
Why the others are wrong — a subagent cannot span sessions, so the durable half is unavailable that way. A background session is durable but reports to you rather than into the conversation that started it, so the reporting half is unavailable that way. And capability is not the axis at all: in every approach the workers are Claude sessions.
Remember this — decide which you need more, the findings coming home or the work surviving you. You cannot have both from one worker.
Sources — Anthropic's Claude Code agents and subagents documentation.
Sources
“Subagents report results back to the conversation that spawned them, and agent view sessions report only to you”
“Subagents work within a single session.”
“Delegated workers inside one session that do a side task in their own context and return a summary”
“In every approach the workers are Claude sessions.”
Practise 10 questions on this topic
Take Claude Code Workflows — Timed Test 1 (10 questions) — scored instantly, explanation for every question, no login.