What is a key trade-off of a linked list compared to an array?

Mediumdsalinked-lists

Fast insertion/deletion at a known position, but slower access to a specific positionCorrect answer
Linked lists always use less memory than arrays in every case
Linked lists provide constant-time indexed access like arrays
Linked lists cannot be traversed at all

Show answer & explanation

Correct answer: A. Fast insertion/deletion at a known position, but slower access to a specific position

Explanation

Linked lists allow fast insertion/deletion once you have a reference to the right node, but accessing a specific position requires traversal from the start.

Practise 3 questions on this topic

Take Linked Lists — Timed Test (3 questions) — scored instantly, explanation for every question, no login.

Start the test

What is a key trade-off of a linked list compared to an array?

Mediumdsalinked-lists

Fast insertion/deletion at a known position, but slower access to a specific positionCorrect answer
Linked lists always use less memory than arrays in every case
Linked lists provide constant-time indexed access like arrays
Linked lists cannot be traversed at all

Show answer & explanation

Correct answer: A. Fast insertion/deletion at a known position, but slower access to a specific position

Explanation

Linked lists allow fast insertion/deletion once you have a reference to the right node, but accessing a specific position requires traversal from the start.

Practise 3 questions on this topic

Take Linked Lists — Timed Test (3 questions) — scored instantly, explanation for every question, no login.

Start the test

What is a key trade-off of a linked list compared to an array?

Related questions

What is a key trade-off of a linked list compared to an array?

Related questions