Last reviewed
Correct answer: B. They spend more computation thinking through a problem before answering, often at the cost of speed
Explanation
A reasoning model does something extra before it speaks: it generates internal reasoning tokens, which OpenAI describes as helping the model "plan, use tools effectively, inspect alternatives, recover from ambiguity, and solve harder multi-step tasks". You never see those tokens, but you pay for them and you wait for them.
That is the trade, and the documentation states it outright: "Lower effort favors speed and lower token usage, while at higher effort the model thinks more completely to provide higher quality responses". On current models this is a dial you set per request rather than a fixed property, so the same model can answer a trivial task cheaply and grind through a hard one.
The honest description is therefore not "smarter" but "spends more before answering". That is why the instant-response option cannot be right — extra thinking takes time by definition — and why being indistinguishable from a lightweight model cannot be either. Reach for these on debugging, multi-step planning and analysis. Do not put one behind a voice interface, where the pause is the whole problem.
Sources
“Lower effort favors speed and lower token usage, while at higher effort the model thinks more completely to provide higher quality responses.”
“Reasoning token support”
Practise 4 questions on this topic
Take GPT Models Overview — Timed Test (4 questions) — scored instantly, explanation for every question, no login.