Last reviewed
Correct answer: B. Type both follow-ups now, since they queue in order and run automatically when the task finishes.
Explanation
The principle — Typing a next instruction while Agent works adds it to a queue rather than interrupting the run; queued items hold their order and start once the current task ends.
Why the key is correct — Typing the next steps while the current one runs is the intended workflow, and it is what makes a long autonomous run worth starting. The queue preserves order and the same conversation context.
Why the others are wrong — The input is not disabled during a run, so there is no reason to sit and watch. An ordinary submission queues rather than interrupting, though an immediate send exists separately for genuine redirects. A second chat would throw away the context the first has built up.
Remember this — Stack the next instructions while the current one runs; the queue holds them in order.
Sources — Cursor's Agent overview documentation.
Sources
“You have two ways to talk to an agent while it works. Queue a message and it waits for the current task to finish.”
“Agent processes them sequentially after finishing”
Practise 10 questions on this topic
Take Cursor AI Features — Timed Test 1 (10 questions) — scored instantly, explanation for every question, no login.